- Year first released: 1866
- ISBN of the edition I read: 9780451523631
- Publisher of the edition I read: Signet Classics
- My rating (out of 5): 5
The
Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde sits in a rather unique – and deeply
unfortunate – place amongst horror novels:
Everyone
knows (or thinks they know) the story of Jekyll and Hyde. This may sound like
a good thing for Stevenson, to be so well-known and to have created such a
lasting, timeless book. But therein is precisely the problem. Everyone already knows
the story – which means that most all the mystery is gone from the narrative. Case
in point: what most people consider to be the heart of the story is actually left
a complete mystery from the reader until over two-thirds of the way into the
book. Nowadays, you go into the book knowing precisely what Dr. Jekyll is up to,
when his actions are intended to be shrouded in a deep, eerie mystery - and, in fact, are meant to be the ultimate twist of the book.
Did you know, in fact, that Dr. Jekyll
isn’t the main character of the book? – rather, it is a lawyer friend of Jekyll’s
by the name of Utterson.
And we all know that Hyde is notorious
for committing a wealth of crimes and evil deeds. And yet, in actual fact, he
commits only one murder and a couple of assaults – and, contrary to nearly every
contemporary portrayal, never engages the services of a prostitute. (Of course
the murder and assaults are bad enough. I just mean to say that he’s not the
depraved serial killer/lusty pervert that most modern renderings would have us believe.)
All of these things are altogether too
bad, because the book is fascinating and much more intricately crafted than you
could know without having actually read it for yourself. If you can set aside
what you think you know of the story, the unraveling of the mystery is highly
clever – moving around in time, bringing in various characters to impart their
sides of the story, etc. Stevenson’s descriptions are perfectly spot-on. He
does an excellent job of recreating London for us, as well as showing us both the physical
and mental differences between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
It is very difficult to find a better
pure horror novel than The Strange Case
of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. It’s not, per se, the scariest book out there,
but there’s no reason it needs to be – its unsettling nature and philosophical
implications put it in a class of its own, and its succinctness, powerful
descriptions, and psychological exploration place it in the highest order of
horror literature.
All modern media have ruined this story. It drives me crazy and it is why I'm so critical of sherlock holmes. Hyde is not a weird, hulk-like, senseless monster! Makes me so annoyed.
ReplyDeleteMe too! This is the perfect example of why it's always a good idea to go back to the original. And, as you point out, same with Sherlock Holmes. If you've only seen the various movies and heard about Sherlock Holmes, you'd have the complete wrong idea about him.
Deletehuh. I really should read the original. This sounds great.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Sherlock: It's true, various attempts have been made at modernizing his stories, to various degrees of accuracy. My wife and I have been reading the originals, which has been very fulfilling. However, there are a ton of words (mostly occupational nouns) that we don't know. Sometimes we can tell based on context, but not always. It's fun to try to deduce it.
Yes, I think you'd like Jekyll & Hyde. In fact, it's probably the first horror book I'd recommend for you specifically. (That, or World War Z - which I'll be going into in a later post.)
Delete